The statement criticizes cost-plus contracting, suggesting it allows companies to overcharge NASA and taxpayers. It uses a specific example of a contract cost increase to support this claim.
- The statement aims to highlight potential financial inefficiencies, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for better use of taxpayer money. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of a complex issue by providing a specific example, but the use of the word 'scam' could be seen as lacking empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the contracting system, but the language used ('scam') could be perceived as a personal attack on the companies involved. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.