In reply to:
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
@TRobinsonNewEra
·
23d
The statement is a reply to a conversation about legal challenges faced by a public figure, which involves claims of targeted harassment and lawfare. This touches on public discourse as it addresses issues of legal processes and perceived injustices.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a narrative of victimization without evidence.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as indirectly supporting claims of harassment without substantiation.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it simply expresses surprise without further engagement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech but does not substantively contribute to the discussion or provide evidence for claims.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.