In reply to:
435lb AUM
@DeadLiftCapital
·
32d
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the effectiveness and limitations of AI technology in business settings. The conversation highlights the paradox of AI's integration into company budgets versus its perceived underperformance in automating tasks requiring high accuracy.
- The statement does not cause harm and presents a balanced view of AI's capabilities and limitations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation promotes understanding by discussing real-world applications and challenges of AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The dialogue is constructive, focusing on the topic without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.