Daniel Horowitz
@RMConservative
·
5h
The statement critiques the actions of a particular industry, suggesting that it relies on its size and influence to secure favorable policies, such as regulatory moratoriums and intellectual property rights abrogation. It implies that these actions are part of a broader strategy to mitigate risk by being 'Too Big to Fail.' The statement is critical of the industry's reliance on government bailouts and suggests political influence by the AI lobby.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of industry practices.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the industry's strategies but lacks empathy or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight issues within the industry, potentially for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss public concerns responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.