Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement is a politically charged critique of a government shutdown attributed to a specific political figure and party. It discusses the impact of the shutdown on public services, such as airport operations, and implies a lack of concern from the opposing party for the public's inconvenience. The tone is accusatory and aims to assign blame for the situation.
- The statement uses charged language that could contribute to political polarization, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does target a political group in a negative light.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame rather than solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a personal attack on political opponents. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive, as it could exacerbate division. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.