The statement questions whether legacy media has covered alleged scams involving job advertisements and immigration processes. It implies a lack of media coverage on these issues, suggesting a potential bias or oversight. The conversation involves criticism of media and immigration policies, touching on public discourse about media responsibility and immigration practices.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement raises concerns about media coverage, which could be seen as an attempt to highlight potential issues, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by seeking transparency.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it implies criticism of media and immigration practices, which could be seen as indirectly questioning the integrity of those involved.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement could promote understanding by bringing attention to potential issues in job advertising and immigration processes, but it lacks empathy towards the individuals involved.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism of media practices, which could be constructive if it leads to dialogue and improvement, but it lacks specific evidence or constructive suggestions.