In reply to:
The statement criticizes mainstream media (MSM) journalism, particularly in science reporting, for lacking critical analysis and for trusting authorities without scrutiny. It suggests that conflicts of interest are ignored, using a specific example involving a study funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). The tone is accusatory and skeptical of media integrity.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived flaws in journalism, which could be seen as an attempt to improve media standards, but the accusatory tone may not constructively contribute to dialogue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes a group (science journalists) broadly, which could be seen as dismissive of their work. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes broad accusations without specific evidence or suggestions for improvement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.