Ron DeSantis

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 21
11/10/2025, 1:21:18 AM
X
In reply to:
Brad korg
@BradKort
·
45d
@RonDeSantis I used to own a website hosting company. We had servers in 5 countries and generated the bulk of our revenue outside the US. Without hiring an Indian network team, 0 U.S. workers would have been employed instead of 5. An all US staff would have priced us out of the market.
Ron DeSantis
@RonDeSantis
·
45d
It opened my eyes as well especially because what Disney did was legal; that is, US law allowed firing Americans and then having the Americans train their foreign-worker replacements. Bad policy.
CommanderGub
@CommanderGub
·
45d
@RonDeSantis Disney firing all of their IT was the thing that opened my eyes to the absolute treachery of H1B abuse and offshoring. Never forget that betrayal and keep fighting for American workers @RonDeSantis ! Thank you!!!

The statement 'Don’t think Disney had the same excuse' is part of a broader conversation about the use of H1B visas and the impact on American workers. It implies criticism of Disney's actions regarding employment practices, particularly in the context of replacing American workers with foreign ones. The tone is critical and suggests a lack of justification for Disney's actions, aligning with the broader discourse on labor policies and immigration.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of Disney's employment practices.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is critical of a corporation's actions.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more accusatory in nature. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes corporate policy, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight a societal issue, potentially contributing to public discourse on labor policies. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by engaging in a public debate about corporate practices and labor policies. [+1]