Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement suggests a connection between Dr. Ralph Baric, his research, and the CIA, implying a link to the origins of SARS-CoV-2. It questions why Baric has not testified under oath, suggesting a lack of transparency.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by making serious allegations without clear evidence, which may affect reputations. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the privacy and dignity of Dr. Baric by implying misconduct without substantiated proof. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without engaging in a balanced discussion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it makes accusations rather than fostering open discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.