Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth
@SecWar
·
15d
The statement critiques a military campaign, questioning its legality and constitutionality, and challenges the justification of following orders without congressional authorization. It engages in public discourse by addressing the legality of military actions and the responsibilities of military personnel.
- The statement strives to do no harm by highlighting the importance of legal and constitutional adherence, which can prevent unlawful actions and potential harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the legality of the military campaign and the justification of following orders, without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning the legality of government actions and using the platform to discuss constitutional issues. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.