Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a public figure, Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, addressing actions by another public figure, Chuy Garcia, in a formal setting. The statement critiques Garcia's actions as being beneath the dignity of his office and incompatible with the Constitution, indicating engagement with public issues and governance standards.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but is a critique of professional conduct.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the office and does not engage in personal attacks, focusing on actions rather than personal attributes.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is a form of constructive criticism, addressing actions rather than engaging in ad hominem attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using a platform to address governance issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.