In reply to:
Joe Gebbia
@jgebbia
·
10d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing media coverage and the impact of a terrorist attack. It implies criticism of media practices and highlights personal proximity to the event.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to fear or anxiety by emphasizing potential personal danger. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as contributing to a narrative that may stigmatize certain groups. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing instead on personal risk and media criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of media practices but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.