The statement critiques the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, suggesting it was not legislatively enacted and questioning its financial impact on Social Security. The tone is critical, focusing on the perceived economic disadvantages to American graduates and the legality of the program.
- The statement raises concerns about economic impacts, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by highlighting potential issues. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could be seen as indirectly critical of foreign students, which may not fully respect the dignity of all parties involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of the OPT program, but it does not provide a balanced view or constructive dialogue, focusing instead on negative aspects. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.