In reply to:
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
3d
Scott Adams
@ScottAdamsSays
·
3d
Owen Gregorian
@OwenGregorian
·
3d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the economic implications of tariffs, a significant policy issue. It uses a thought experiment to question the logic of tariffs between countries by comparing it to hypothetical tariffs between U.S. states, suggesting that such tariffs would lead to economic catastrophe. This challenges the idea that tariffs can be beneficial, as mentioned in the preceding conversation.
- The statement does not use harmful language and presents an economic argument without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by using a thought experiment to illustrate its point, encouraging readers to consider the broader implications of tariffs. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment with a reasoned argument rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.