In reply to:
Martin Sellner
@Martin_Sellner
·
2d
The statement and conversation engage with historical events related to the expulsion of Germans after World War II, which is a public issue. The original tweet discusses the suffering and displacement of millions, which can evoke strong emotions and potentially controversial interpretations.
- The statement highlights historical suffering, which can be seen as an attempt to acknowledge past harms, but lacks a clear constructive purpose.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could be seen as lacking sensitivity, potentially leading to divisive interpretations. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided historical perspective. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in dialogue or constructive criticism, as it presents information without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.