The statement critiques the advice given by Scott Galloway, as shared by Andrew Yang, by highlighting the disparity between those with power and means and those without. It questions the role of elected leaders and suggests they are more focused on power than serving the public.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques the disparity in power and access.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the challenges faced by those without power or means. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of elected leaders and the advice given, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of society by calling attention to the responsibilities of elected leaders. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing public figures and societal issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.