David Frum
@davidfrum
·
6d
The statement criticizes David Frum for retweeting a fiction writer, implying that the writer lacks credibility on the topic of Trump's actions regarding Epstein. The tone is dismissive and somewhat derogatory, focusing on undermining the writer's expertise rather than engaging with the content of the discussion.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses derogatory language ('jackass') to describe the fiction writer, which can be considered harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the fiction writer, as it engages in a form of personal attack by dismissing their credibility in a derogatory manner. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead of addressing the content of the writer's argument, it resorts to an ad hominem attack by questioning the writer's expertise. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.