John E. Hooper
@JohnEHooper17
·
4d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of transparency and accountability in the release of files related to the Trump administration. It critiques the role of certain media figures and political entities in the handling of these files, suggesting a shift in their stance once the issue became problematic for the Trump administration.
- The statement uses derogatory language ('useful idiots') which could be seen as harmful and disrespectful, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of derogatory language could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing others rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks by labeling certain individuals as 'useful idiots,' which detracts from constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity due to its derogatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.