Tax Foundation
@TaxFoundation
·
301d
The statement critiques the implementation of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) taxes, arguing that they infringe on individual privacy by requiring government surveillance. It opposes the idea of other states adopting this model, as suggested by the Tax Foundation's discussion on funding highway projects through VMT taxes.
- The statement raises concerns about privacy, which can be seen as an attempt to prevent potential harm from government surveillance. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by highlighting potential violations, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by bringing attention to privacy issues, but it lacks a balanced discussion of the benefits of VMT taxes.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could benefit from more constructive dialogue on the issue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.