Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement reports on a serious criminal investigation involving a former athlete, which is a matter of public interest. It uses strong language, such as 'murderous mastermind,' which could be seen as prejudicial before a legal verdict is reached.
- The statement may cause harm by using inflammatory language that could influence public perception before a trial. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement may not fully respect the privacy and dignity of the individual involved, as it presumes guilt. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and uses potentially prejudicial language. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.