🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸
@mrddmia
·
59d
The statement criticizes the inclusion of a provision related to AI amnesty in a defense bill, suggesting it undermines voter trust. It engages in public discourse by addressing legislative processes and corporate influence, which are public concerns.
- The statement uses strong language ('insult to voters') but does not directly harm individuals, focusing instead on legislative critique.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it targets legislative actions rather than individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses accusatory language without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes legislative tactics, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about legislative issues, potentially contributing to societal betterment by encouraging scrutiny of legislative processes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion on legislative matters, using the platform responsibly to highlight public concerns. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.