Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement critiques Kamala Harris and other Democrats for their current stance on the Epstein files, suggesting hypocrisy due to past inaction. It implies a political motive and questions the integrity of the individuals involved.
- The statement could be seen as attempting to hold public figures accountable, but it may also contribute to political polarization.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it questions the integrity of public figures, which could be seen as undermining their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide a constructive dialogue or evidence to support the claims. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.