Matt Taibbi

Rank 21 of 47

Score 31

@KierkegaardLeap It’s not evidence of a blackmail scheme at all. It’s barely evidence of an active intelligence role. It’s very interesting and increases our understanding of Epstein, but it’s not evidence of that popular belief.

11/20/2025, 8:28:16 PM

In reply to:

Kierkegaard's Leap

@KierkegaardLeap

10d

@mtaibbi You're using the word "evidence", when you (apparently) mean the word "proof".

It's an important distinction, particularly for a journalist. You should know better.

High-level contact with Israeli intelligence is evidence.

Matt Taibbi

@mtaibbi

10d

Ryan, with respect, none of what you’ve reported is evidence of a Mossad-aided sexual blackmail scheme. It shows high-level contact with Israeli intelligence, and that’s interesting. But it’s a long haul from a Mongolian security agreement to blackmailing the White House

Ryan Grim

@ryangrim

11d

@mtaibbi Would recommend these https://www.dropsitenews.com/s/e…

The statement is part of a public discourse discussing the implications of Jeffrey Epstein's connections with Israeli intelligence and the broader narrative around it. The tone is analytical and aims to clarify the distinction between evidence and proof in the context of journalism.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying misconceptions and avoiding sensationalism, which aligns with the principle. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by distinguishing between evidence and proof, which is crucial for informed public discourse. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a potential misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]