Matt Taibbi

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 31
11/21/2025, 6:47:38 PM
X
In reply to:
DavidNietzsche2310
@nietzsche258918
·
9d
@Jclearfield2 @mtaibbi Spot on
Traddoc (Tdoc)
@Jclearfield2
·
9d
@mtaibbi No evidence seems a bit strong. "Not enough to convict anyone in court" would seem more accurate.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
9d
He certainly had very high level Israeli contacts. But there’s no evidence he was involved in any kind of intelligence blackmail scheme.
DavidNietzsche2310
@nietzsche258918
·
9d
@mtaibbi Matt, do you suspect Israel to have been working with Epstein, as Charlie Kirk suggested?

The statement is part of a broader conversation about allegations of blackmail and censorship involving high-profile figures and entities, which are public issues. The tone is inquisitive, seeking clarification on the evidence related to these allegations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm as it is a request for information rather than an accusation. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity by not making unfounded accusations or engaging in hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification on the evidence, which can lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for evidence rather than making personal attacks. [+1]