In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the role of public figures in content moderation and information disorder, referencing a report by the Aspen Institute. It also touches on issues of journalism integrity and corporate influence.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises concerns about media influence, which could indirectly impact public trust.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures in their professional capacities. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting the involvement of notable figures in addressing information disorder. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of media practices, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to dialogue about journalism standards. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.