In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
8d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
8d
The statement and accompanying images discuss the need for America to address historical power structures and disinformation, aligning with broader regulatory frameworks like the EU's Digital Services Act. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with societal issues of inequality, historical injustices, and content moderation.
- The statement aims to address harm by confronting historical injustices and misinformation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging historical and ongoing societal issues. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by proposing a 'whole-of-society' approach to address these issues. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by suggesting systemic changes. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by discussing content moderation in the context of public safety and truth. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.