Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate on foreign policy and the role of public figures in shaping public opinion. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, with personal attacks and sarcasm. The intent seems to be to discredit the opposing party rather than engage in constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it includes dismissive and sarcastic language that could be considered harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, engaging in personal attacks and dismissive language. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and sarcasm. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.