Jake Tapper

Rank 8 of 47

Score 139

Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅

CASSIDY: I know it's titillating, but I think we need to move beyond the titillation

TAPPER: This isn't about titillation. This is about the fact that you are the chairman of the health committee and you voted to confirm somebody that by all accounts is actually making America

11/23/2025, 2:42:27 PM

The statement involves a discussion between a journalist and a public official about a significant public health issue, specifically the confirmation of a person affecting public health policy. The journalist challenges the official's decision, emphasizing the importance of accountability and the impact on public health.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by addressing a public health concern, though the term 'titillation' could be seen as dismissive.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The journalist promotes understanding by questioning the official's decision, aiming to clarify the implications for public health. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The dialogue is constructive, focusing on policy and accountability rather than personal attacks. [+1]