Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement by Crockett addresses public issues related to political behavior and its consequences within the MAGA movement. It critiques a public figure's role in fostering divisive rhetoric and questions the response when similar tactics are used against her.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by attributing blame for hate, but it also highlights the consequences of such actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as critical, potentially bordering on personal attack. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by pointing out the consequences of actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but could be more constructive and less personal. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.