Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a discussion about political polling and public perception, which is part of public discourse. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat skeptical, as the interviewer questions the validity of the poll numbers mentioned by Trump. The response from Hassett is non-committal, indicating a lack of expertise in polling.
- The statement does not cause harm but questions the accuracy of information, which is a neutral stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification on the poll numbers, though it could be more informative. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The dialogue is constructive, as it questions the information without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.