Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement is a response to a conversation involving potential threats and public figures, which could be considered public discourse. However, the reply itself is more of a personal anecdote with a humorous tone, lacking substantive engagement with the public issue at hand. It does not address the serious nature of the original conversation and instead diverts to a lighthearted narrative about a visit to a restaurant.
- The statement does not cause harm but trivializes a potentially serious issue, which could be seen as insensitive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy regarding the original issue, as it shifts focus to a personal story. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it does not address the original issue directly. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.