rose carmazon
@RCarmazon40323
·
5d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of military obedience to orders and the potential consequences of political parties encouraging disobedience. It critiques a public figure's stance on military orders and discusses the implications for societal stability.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does critique a political stance, which could be seen as contributing to a broader debate.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on public figures and their public statements rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by clarifying a position on military obedience and its implications for societal order. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the argument rather than attacking the individual personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public debate about military obedience and political influence, using the platform to discuss societal issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.