The statement 'Pretty sure that’s not how the law works' is a critique of a legal interpretation regarding the president's orders and Congress's role. It engages in public discourse by addressing the legality of political actions and statements. The tone is skeptical and challenges the accuracy of the legal claims made.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the legality of actions, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on critiquing a legal interpretation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the legal interpretation, but it lacks depth in explaining the reasoning behind the skepticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.