The statement criticizes a decision to cut resources for measuring and analyzing important economic aspects, in response to a news report about the cancellation of a GDP report. It questions the decision-making of those responsible, implying a critique of public policy.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses a critical tone to question a decision, which is a common aspect of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of a decision but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It questions the decision-making process rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by questioning a public policy decision, which is a responsible use of a platform to engage in civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.