Reposted by Ron DeSantis
The statement and accompanying image critique Ken Burns' documentary for allegedly distorting the history of America's founding. The tone is critical and suggests that the documentary promotes a political agenda. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with historical interpretation and media influence on public perception.
- The statement aims to critique a documentary, which can be seen as engaging in public discourse. However, the use of terms like 'childish canard' may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The critique could be seen as dismissive, potentially undermining the dignity of those involved in the documentary. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the documentary's perspective without engaging with its arguments. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.