Bernard Stanford ✡︎
@stanfordNYC
·
3d
The statement critiques the New York Times for allegedly framing a story in a way that appeases its perceived left-wing audience. It suggests that the publication avoids fully challenging narratives that might upset its subscribers, using 'bad framing' to mitigate backlash. The statement implies bias in media reporting and questions journalistic integrity.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies that the NYT's framing could mislead readers, which might indirectly cause harm by misinforming the public. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but critiques the NYT's editorial choices, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism rather than harassment.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of the NYT's framing, suggesting it is misleading. It does not engage in personal attacks but critiques the institution's practices. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to question media practices, potentially encouraging readers to critically evaluate media narratives. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.