Matt Taibbi

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 29
Rick Fairhurst
@RickFairhurst1
·
15h
@mtaibbi I don’t agree. A source should be accountable for what he/she says or writes, and then protected with the full weight and force of society if their claims are confirmed. A good example is a source document, whose authenticity is verified and survival is preserved
11/28/2025, 2:59:11 PM
X

The statement discusses the use of anonymous sources in journalism, emphasizing the importance of corroborating such information with on-record sources. It aims to clarify a position on journalistic practices, particularly the balance between protecting sources and ensuring accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for responsible journalism practices. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the privacy and dignity of anonymous sources by emphasizing their protection. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by explaining the rationale behind using anonymous sources. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive dialogue by addressing differing opinions on the use of anonymous sources. [+1]