Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement is a reply to a conversation about a serious public issue involving alleged military actions and potential legal implications. It references a Washington Post article, suggesting engagement with a public debate on military conduct and legal accountability.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but engages with a topic that involves harm, requiring careful consideration of language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is important to respect the privacy and dignity of those involved in the incident.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a simple reference to an article.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it merely shares a link without additional commentary. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by sharing a news article, but it lacks additional context or responsible commentary.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.