Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement reports on a military action by the US in the Caribbean, raising concerns about potential violations of the law of armed conflict. It engages with public issues related to military conduct and international law, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but reports on an action that may have caused harm, raising awareness of potential legal and ethical issues.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not naming individuals involved, focusing instead on the actions and their implications. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting concerns about the legality of the strike, the statement promotes understanding and empathy regarding the consequences of military actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement presents concerns about the strike without engaging in personal attacks, allowing for constructive dialogue on the issue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to responsibly raise awareness about potential legal violations, upholding free speech principles. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.