Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth
@SecWar
·
17h
The statement and linked content discuss a serious public issue involving military actions and their consequences, which is a matter of public concern and debate. The tone of the statement is accusatory and defensive, suggesting a denial of the reported events and criticizing the media for their portrayal.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the reported harm caused by the military strike without addressing the potential loss of life. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those affected by the strike, as it dismisses the report as fake news without acknowledging the gravity of the situation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on discrediting the media rather than addressing the humanitarian implications of the strike. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it attacks the media with derogatory language rather than addressing the content of the report. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly, as it uses its platform to discredit the media without providing evidence or engaging in a factual discussion. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.