Ro Khanna
@RoKhanna
·
48d
The statement questions the feasibility of passing a constitutional amendment, using a sarcastic tone to suggest that even changing the country's name might be controversial due to historical figures' reputations. It indirectly engages with the public discourse on the use of presidential pardon power, as initiated by the conversation about Trump's commutation of a sentence.
- The statement uses sarcasm but does not directly harm others with words or actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The sarcastic tone does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the complexity of public discourse. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses sarcasm rather than reasoned argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so with sarcasm, which may not be the most responsible or constructive use of a platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.