John Sobieski III
@99DeusVult
·
43d
The statement is part of a conversation about college football rankings and the criteria used to determine the best teams. It engages in a discussion about sports rankings, which can be considered a public issue within the context of sports discourse. The tone is speculative and analytical, focusing on hypothetical outcomes of games and their impact on team rankings.
- The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on sports analysis rather than personal attacks.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage in a reasoned discussion about sports rankings.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue about sports rankings without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.