The statement questions the focus of public concern, highlighting a perceived inconsistency in addressing radicalization and violence. It implies a critique of selective outrage and prioritization of issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises a sensitive issue that could be perceived as divisive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does indirectly question the motives of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on critiquing perceived inconsistencies in public discourse. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.