Resist the Mainstream
@ResisttheMS
·
42d
The statement and conversation address a public issue concerning academic freedom, religious expression, and gender identity in higher education. The tone suggests criticism of the university's handling of the situation, implying a broader problem of 'intellectual rot.'
- The statement may cause harm by using a derogatory term like 'intellectual rot,' which could be seen as dismissive of differing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not revealing personal details beyond what is necessary for the discussion. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses a negative framing without exploring the complexities of the issue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it uses a broad, critical term without offering specific solutions or engaging with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.