Ron DeSantis

The statement and conversation address a public issue regarding academic freedom, religious expression, and discrimination in higher education. The tone is critical, suggesting a perceived problem in the academic system. The university's response indicates a commitment to addressing the student's concerns and ensuring fairness.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially harm by labeling the situation as 'intellectual rot,' which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in a form of public shaming of the institution.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses a derogatory term without offering a solution. [-1]