The statement and conversation engage with a public issue concerning educational policy and transparency at state-funded universities. The discussion involves the implications of requiring professors to publicly post syllabi, which touches on academic freedom, privacy, and public accountability.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a broader discussion on educational policy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it discusses policy rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the rationale behind the policy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the policy without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public policy discussion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.