Jessica Tarlov
@JessicaTarlov
·
44d
The statement questions the perceived disparity in public concern between a National Guard member and alleged drug dealers, suggesting a critique of societal or media priorities. It implies a moral judgment about the value placed on different lives.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by implying that some lives are valued less than others, which may not promote a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a divisive manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and may provoke defensiveness rather than dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.