Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a policy change related to federal fuel standards, which is a public issue affecting economic and environmental aspects. It presents President Trump's intention to alter existing regulations set by the Biden administration, highlighting potential economic benefits and support from automakers.
- The statement does not directly address potential harm or benefits beyond economic savings, such as environmental impact, which could be considered a minor oversight. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on economic benefits.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone regarding the policy change. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a policy change that is presented as beneficial for society, though it lacks a comprehensive view of potential impacts. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a policy change and uses the platform to inform the public about governmental actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.