Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement involves a public figure, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, addressing claims made by another public figure, former Vice President Kamala Harris, in her book. This constitutes public discourse as it involves a public debate over the accuracy of statements made in a book by a political figure, which can influence public perception and political dynamics.
- The statement accuses Kamala Harris of lying, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does involve a personal attack by accusing Harris of lying and self-interest, which could be seen as disrespectful to her dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to a personal attack rather than addressing the content of the book or providing evidence for the claims. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.