Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement and linked content engage with public discourse by discussing public opinion on foreign policy and its relevance to political leadership, specifically in the context of former President Trump. It questions the importance voters place on foreign policy issues and the title 'president of peace,' which are relevant to civic dialogue and public concerns.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it presents data and a question for consideration.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement raises a question that could promote understanding of public opinion on foreign policy, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, instead focusing on public opinion data and a political title. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing public opinion and political titles without misinformation or inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.